The Octagon
Sacramento Country Day School
Sacramento, CA
Issue Date: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Issue: Vol. XXXV, No. 7
Last Update: Tuesday, May 08, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Photo illustration by Lauren Taylor
Monday, February 14, 2011 By Margaret Whitney
Advertising
If you were to randomly select a senior, chances are you would pick a “Sarah.”
Of the seven “Sarahs” currently attending (or teaching) at SCDS, five are in the high school and, of those five, four are in the senior class.
That is to say roughly 11 percent of the senior class is named “Sarah.”
This level of popularity follows the trends shown on Social Security Online (S.S.O.), a Website that lists the top 200 names per decade for male and female babies.
“Sarah” was the fourth most popular name for girls born in the 1990s, according to S.S.O., having jumped into the top 20 names for girls in the 1970s.
According to senior Sarah Habbas, having four “Sarahs” in a grade tends to cause some confusion, especially when all four share a class, like junior AP English last year.
“You could never know if someone was talking to you or not,” Habbas said. Senior Sarah Fleming agrees.
“It can be embarrassing when you react and they aren’t talking to you,” she said.
Fleming and Sarah Mancina, also a senior, are both members of the SCDS piano trio, playing violin and cello respectively.
They avoid confusion by using the nicknames “Big Sarah” for Mancina and “Little Sarah” for Fleming.
These come from both their heights and instrument sizes, as the violin is much smaller than the cello.
While popular in the high school, “Sarah” is all but absent in the faculty and lower grades, following the downward trend reflected by S.S.O.’s rankings.
However, there are currently five “Patricias” on the staff.
This is consistent with the name’s peak in the 1950s and ‘60s as the third and fifth most popular girls’ name, respectively.
After this boom in popularity, the name’s prevalence dropped, and it no longer appears in the top 200 baby names.
Neither English teacher Patricia Fels nor art teacher Patricia Kelly runs into problems with the duplicate names.
Most people call Fels by her last name.
There were multiple “Patricias” in Fels’s elementary school, where she adopted the nickname “Fels.”
“[This] started in fifth grade when I sat in front of a girl named Patti Fenner. So to make it easier, I just became Fels and she was Fenner,” she said.
For Kelly, the solution was her initials.
Most now know her as “Ms. PK,” though some still call her Patricia.
And everyone knows math teacher Patricia Dias as “Mrs. D” (if they remember not to call her “Ms. J” as they did before she married last year).
Though numerous on the faculty, “Patricia” is missing altogether from the student body. But other names are on the rise.
There are five girls named Zoe between the middle and lower schools and not a single one in the faculty or upper grades.
This coincides with its appearance in the top 200 baby names of the 1980s, rising from 179 in the 1990s to 54 in the 2000s.
The trends for boy names can also be traced through the school.
“Brandon” is as prominent in the high school as “Sarah,” with five between the four grades. There are, however, only two in the rest of the school.
“Brandon” peaked in the 1990s at 11 before dropping back down to 21 in the 2000s.
Though there are two “Brandons” in the sophomore class, according to Brandon Pefferle, this doesn’t cause many problems.
“People just call me by my last name, and sometimes [Brandon Mysicka] too,” Pefferle said.
Of the five “Jacobs” in the school, four are in the middle and lower schools, consistent with that name’s rise in popularity in the 2000s.
It has replaced “Michael” as the most popular name for boys.
“Jack” and “Jackson” are two names popular schoolwide, with eight in the student body.
“Jack” has risen from 167 in the 1980s to 40 in the 2000s, while “Jackson” didn’t appear in the top 200 boy names in the 1980s but jumped to 42 in the 2000s.
There has also been a spike in popularity of androgynous names in the middle and lower schools.
There are four “Aidans” and one “Aiden” in the lower and middle schools
These sprang into the 54th and 55th spots for boys respectively in the 2000s after not making the top 200 names for boys or girls any decade prior.
“Sam” is also common throughout the student body for both boys and girls, with six “Sams” and one “Sami.”
“Sam” appears to be consistently popular in all grades, while, according to S.S.O. “Sam” is on the rise for boys, going from 52 in the 1980s to 24 in the 2000s.
High-school teacher Brooke Wells occasionally encounters confusion about his name with people who don’t know him.
“I sometimes get letters addressed to Ms. Brooke Wells, college counselor,” he said.
Though his name does tend to cause confusion, Wells is proud of it.
“I was named after my grandfather, Lt. Colonel Kenneth Brooke,” said Wells. “[Wells’s name] was a token of respect to him.”
Why so many parents choose “Sarah” or “Patricia” at any given time can’t be proven.
In Kelly’s case, she was named after a cousin because her mother liked the name, while Fels was named after her mother.
Fleming’s cousin’s name inspired her parents to name her “Sarah.”
Mancina’s parents wavered between “Rose” and “Francesca” before finally deciding on “Sarah.”
“They just liked [Sarah] the most,” said Mancina.
Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, in their book “Freakonomics,” found a correlation between the financial situation of the parents and their child’s name.
Using the work of Roland G. Fryer Jr., a Harvard professor who examined the birth-certificate information of every child born in California since 1961, they found that parents name their children with names that sound “successful.”
“It is the family just a few blocks over, the one with the bigger house and newer car,” they write in the book.
“Parents are reluctant to poach a name from someone too near—family members or close friends—but many parents, whether they realize it or not, like the sound of names that sound ‘successful.’”
Name trends begin with the elite, they write. When a name becomes popular among the richest or most successful or intelligent, it trickles down through the tiers of society, as all want their children to experience the same success as others.
Eventually, a name becomes so commonplace it is no longer “high-end,” and falls out of common usage as society moves on to the next “it” moniker.
Using this theory, Dubner and Levitt predicted what they believe could be some of the top boys’ and girls’ names of 2015.
For girls: Annika, Eleanora, Isabel, Maya and Philippa. And for boys: Anderson, Bennett, Carter, Sander and Oliver.
|
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mollie Berg
Editor-in-Chief/Centerpoint Editor
Email Me
Christina Petlowany
Editor-in-Chief/News Editor
Email Me
Ian Cardle
Editor-in-Chief/Business Manager
Email Me
Zach Lemos
Copy Editor
Garrett Kaighn
Assistant Copy Editor
Email Me
Madeleine Wright
Feature Editor
Email Me
Margaret Whitney
Feature Editor
Email Me
Darby Bosco
Sports Editor
Kelsi Thomas
Photo Editor
Will Wright
Photographer
Micaela Bennett-Smith
Reporter
Morgan Bennett-Smith
Reporter
Skovran Cunningham
Reporter
Grant Miner
Reporter
David Myers
Reporter
Max Shukuya
Reporter
|
- Tue, Sep 26, 2006
Vol. XXX, No. 1
- Tue, Oct 24, 2006
Vol. XXX, No. 2
- Tue, Nov 21, 2006
Vol. XXX, No. 3
- Tue, Jan 16, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 4
- Tue, Feb 13, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 5
- Tue, Mar 13, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 6
- Tue, May 01, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 7
- Tue, May 29, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 8
- Tue, Sep 25, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 1
- Tue, Oct 23, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 2
- Tue, Nov 20, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 3
- Tue, Dec 18, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 4
- Tue, Mar 11, 2008
Vol. XXXI, No. 6
- Tue, May 27, 2008
Vol. XXXI, No. 8
- Tue, Sep 23, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 2
- Tue, Nov 18, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 5
- Tue, Sep 29, 2009
Vol. XXXIII, No. 1
- Tue, Nov 03, 2009
Vol. XXXIII, No. 2
- Tue, Dec 08, 2009
Vol. XXXIII, No. 3
- Tue, Jan 12, 2010
Vol. XXXIII No. 4
- Tue, Feb 16, 2010
Vol. XXXIII No. 5
- Tue, Mar 16, 2010
Vol. XXXIII, No. 6
- Tue, May 04, 2010
Vol. XXXIII, No. 7
- Tue, Jun 01, 2010
Vol. XXXIII, No. 8
- Tue, Dec 07, 2010
Vol. XXXIV, No. 3
- Tue, Jan 11, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 4
- Tue, Feb 15, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, NO. 5
- Tue, Mar 15, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 6
- Tue, May 03, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 7
- Tue, May 31, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 8
- Tue, Aug 30, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 1
- Tue, Sep 27, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 2
- Tue, Nov 08, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 3
- Tue, Dec 13, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 4
- Tue, Feb 14, 2012
Vol. XXXV, No. 5
- Tue, Mar 13, 2012
Vol. XXXV. No. 6
- Tue, Apr 24, 2012
Vol. XXXV, No. 7
|
There are currently 49 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Tue, Mar 13, 2012
Vol. XXXV. No. 6
- Tue, Feb 14, 2012
Vol. XXXV, No. 5
- Tue, Dec 13, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 4
- Tue, Nov 08, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 3
- Tue, Sep 27, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 2
- Tue, Aug 30, 2011
Vol. XXXV, No. 1
- Tue, May 31, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 8
- Tue, May 03, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 7
- Tue, Mar 15, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 6
- Tue, Feb 15, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, NO. 5
- Tue, Jan 11, 2011
Vol. XXXIV, No. 4
- Tue, Dec 07, 2010
Vol. XXXIV, No. 3
- Tue, Jun 01, 2010
Vol. XXXIII, No. 8
- Tue, May 04, 2010
Vol. XXXIII, No. 7
- Tue, Mar 16, 2010
Vol. XXXIII, No. 6
- Tue, Feb 16, 2010
Vol. XXXIII No. 5
- Tue, Jan 12, 2010
Vol. XXXIII No. 4
- Tue, Dec 08, 2009
Vol. XXXIII, No. 3
- Tue, Nov 03, 2009
Vol. XXXIII, No. 2
- Tue, Sep 29, 2009
Vol. XXXIII, No. 1
- Tue, May 26, 2009
Vol. XXXII, No. 11
- Tue, Apr 28, 2009
Vol. XXXII, No. 10
- Tue, Mar 17, 2009
Vol. XXXII, No. 9
- Tue, Feb 17, 2009
Vol. XXXII, No. 8
- Tue, Jan 13, 2009
Vol. XXXII, No. 7
- Tue, Dec 16, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 6
- Tue, Nov 18, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 5
- Tue, Oct 28, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 4
- Tue, Oct 07, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 3
- Tue, Sep 23, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 2
- Mon, Aug 25, 2008
Vol. XXXII, No. 1
- Tue, May 27, 2008
Vol. XXXI, No. 8
- Tue, Apr 29, 2008
Vol. XXXI, No. 7
- Mon, Apr 14, 2008
Web Exclusives: March 11-April 28
- Tue, Mar 11, 2008
Vol. XXXI, No. 6
- Sat, Mar 01, 2008
Web Exclusives: Feb. 15-March 10
- Tue, Feb 12, 2008
Vol. XXXI, No. 5
- Tue, Dec 18, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 4
- Tue, Nov 20, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 3
- Tue, Oct 23, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 2
- Tue, Sep 25, 2007
Vol. XXXI, No. 1
- Tue, May 29, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 8
- Tue, May 01, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 7
- Tue, Mar 13, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 6
- Tue, Feb 13, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 5
- Tue, Jan 16, 2007
Vol. XXX, No. 4
- Tue, Nov 21, 2006
Vol. XXX, No. 3
- Tue, Oct 24, 2006
Vol. XXX, No. 2
- Tue, Sep 26, 2006
Vol. XXX, No. 1
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|