|
|
|
|
Thursday, March 03, 2011 By Robb Larson
Advertising
“No one man should
have all that power.” Kanye West phrases my thoughts well in “POWER,” an apt
anthem for the Wisconsin public sector’s
favorite college-dropout tea partier governor, Scott Walker. In a bold and
bullrushed union-busting legislative move, Governor Walker introduced the
“Budget Repair Bill” on February 11. The bill included provisions for state
employees to be required to pay 50% of their annual pension payment, and at
least 12.6% annually of the average cost of a healthcare premium. The removal
of collective bargaining is of course the primary issue--I will get back to
that shortly.
Now,
as a nonunionized private sector worker might say, “is it really too much too
ask for the public sector to pay just a little more for their healthcare and retirement
benefits?” Well, fictive private employee, yes, it is. For one, state workers
on average earn 11% less than comparable private sector workers in salary.
Furthermore, jobs in the public sector typically require more education; 48% of
public employees are college graduates, as opposed to 23% of the private
sector. And as we all know, college isn’t cheap. With these factors considered, on average, state and local employees earn 6.8% to 7.4% less in total compensation than comparable private workers. However, even with
this imbalance of compensation between public and private sector, public sector
unions have agreed to make these concessions. Now they’re fighting a bigger
fight.
The
most scrutinized and debated language in the Budget Repair Bill was that
regarding the removal of collective bargaining rights for all public employees.
Wisconsin, in
1959, was the first state to institute collective bargaining rights. 52 years
later, here we are to witness those 52 years of mutual respect between state
and state employee being curbstomped. These rights being removed means that
public employees cannot negotiate the conditions of their employment: pay, work
hours, training, and safety, among other things.
Here’s
where it gets ugly: included in the bill is a provision that allows the state
Department of Administration to sell state energy plants for whatever they
please. No oversight, no necessity for open bidding. This is power put in
the state’s hands, more specifically, the hands of a governor in the back
pocket of anti-union corporate interests like the Koch brothers (Oh, you didn’t hear about the prank call of all prank calls that Mr. Walker picked up?). Having received millions in campaign contributions
from multistate corporations, and having given $450 million in tax relief to
multistate corporations earlier this year, it seems awfully convenient that
this provision would be included. It lends a window of opportunity for the
governor to reimburse his campaign contributors, like Koch Industries, an
energy company.
As
a citizen of the United States,
a resident of Wisconsin,
a high school student, and a hopeful education major, I am appalled. I am
furious, disgusted, and afraid. This is not the “by the people, for the people”
government I learned about in my state-funded education. We’re on a departure
from democracy, en route to oligarchy. Next stop, government by the wealthy,
for the wealthy. Who will survive in America?
The
republicans at the capitol have closed their windows, much like the second
Continental Congress did during the drafting of the Declaration of
Independence. The windows at Independence Hall, however, were closed to prevent
British espionage. The windows at the Capitol were closed to drown out the voices
of the people they represent. The Wisconsin legislature is not reminiscent of
the stifling, sweltering sweatlodge that was Independence Hall in the summer of
1787, in which the congress met for hours upon hours debating independence from
Britain.
Our elected officials are out of touch with their constituents, a political
experiment gone awry. And if they so choose to soften our cries for fairness,
then we have to be louder.
|
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
- Wed, Oct 29, 2008
Vol. XLII Issue 2
- Fri, Jan 30, 2009
VOL. XLI, Issue 5
- Fri, Feb 05, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 4
- Thu, Mar 04, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 5
- Fri, Dec 18, 2009
Vol. XLII; Issue 3
- Mon, Nov 16, 2009
Vol. XLII; Issue 2
- Mon, Sep 29, 2008
Vol. XLI Issue 1
- Mon, Dec 22, 2008
VOL. XLI, Issue 4
- Thu, Oct 06, 2011
Vol XLIV: Issue 1
- Fri, Feb 03, 2012
Vol XLIV: Issue 4
- Sun, Jun 03, 2012
Vol. XLIV; Issue VI
|
There are currently 31 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Mon, Mar 18, 2013
XLV; Issue 1
- Fri, Sep 21, 2012
Fall 2012 Web
- Sun, Jun 03, 2012
Vol. XLIV; Issue VI
- Mon, Apr 02, 2012
Vol XLIV: Issue 5
- Fri, Feb 03, 2012
Vol XLIV: Issue 4
- Fri, Dec 16, 2011
Vol XLIV: Issue 3
- Fri, Nov 11, 2011
Vol XLIV: Issue 2
- Thu, Oct 06, 2011
Vol XLIV: Issue 1
- Sun, Jun 05, 2011
Vol.:XLIII; Issue: 8
- Thu, Jun 02, 2011
Vol.:XLIII; Issue: 7
- Fri, Apr 01, 2011
Vol.:XLIII; Issue: 6
- Thu, Mar 03, 2011
Vol: XLIII; Issue 5
- Thu, Feb 03, 2011
Vol. XLIII; Issue: 4
- Tue, Dec 21, 2010
Vol. XLIII; Issue: 3
- Thu, Nov 11, 2010
Vol. XLIII; Issue: 2
- Wed, Oct 06, 2010
Vol. XLIII; Issue: 1
- Sun, Jun 06, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 8
- Sat, May 01, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 7
- Thu, Apr 01, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 6
- Thu, Mar 04, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 5
- Fri, Feb 05, 2010
Vol. XLII; Issue 4
- Fri, Dec 18, 2009
Vol. XLII; Issue 3
- Mon, Nov 16, 2009
Vol. XLII; Issue 2
- Fri, Oct 09, 2009
Vol XLII; Issue 1
- Tue, May 05, 2009
Vol. XLI; Issue 11
- Wed, Apr 01, 2009
VOL. XLIII, Issue 7
- Fri, Jan 30, 2009
VOL. XLI, Issue 5
- Mon, Dec 22, 2008
VOL. XLI, Issue 4
- Tue, Nov 25, 2008
Vol. XLII Issue 3
- Wed, Oct 29, 2008
Vol. XLII Issue 2
- Mon, Sep 29, 2008
Vol. XLI Issue 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Thu, Mar 03, 2011
En route to oligarchy: Budget Bill controversy
- Thu, Mar 03, 2011
The otherside of the fence: Controversy Budget Bill
- Thu, Mar 03, 2011
On the otherside of the fence: Budget Blog Counter
- Thu, Mar 03, 2011
En route to oligarchy: Budget Bill Controversy
- Mon, Nov 22, 2010
TA Blog: French
- Fri, Apr 30, 2010
“Illegal is not a race, it is a crime”
View More
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|