The line between what's acceptable for television and what isn't is often probed and tested. As time goes on, television shows seem anxious to cross that line. That line is especially monitored when it comes to shows that are aimed at teenagers, such as "Degrassi," "The Hard Times of RJ Berger" and, most recently, "Skins."

Many would say that "Skins" frequently crosses that line of acceptability. The new U.S remake of the popular British show has sparked a lot of controversy since its first airing.

The show follows a group of high school students who actually face a lot of issues real high school students face today. Despite that fact, the show has sent advertisers running and has parents frantically reaching for pen and paper to stop the show. This is definitely an overreaction. People need to take a second look at this show and others like it.

“Skins,” “Degrassi” and other teen shows like them are known for their racy humor and reckless abandon to talk about anything regardless of what the parents think. This edge is what makes these shows entertaining, but what makes them enthralling is the subject matter they tackle.

Whether or not society is willing to admit it, the average teenager is presented with similar circumstances that the show covers, whether it be drugs, sex or alcohol. These themes need no introduction, and the effects that these issues have on the characters in the series should be praised rather than criticized. “Skins” doesn't glorify these things. It actually gives a realistic point of view on the outcomes that can result from them. We shouldn't be so quick to run away from and judge things that are gritty just because they’re gritty.

Shows like “Skins” are more than what they appear on face value. All of those shows have had moments where they resonated with viewers, moments where the audience can relate to a character’s personal struggle and find some strength in that.

The issues that the characters face and their youthful appearances make it easy for some people to compare their troubles to the zeitgeist of the current generation.

Sometimes it becomes hard to identify just what separates “Skins” from other overbearing shows, such as “Jersey Shore,” “Robot Chicken” and “Family Guy,” until you think about the setting. Having high school students as the main characters shouldn't cause as much controversy as it has.

Parents need to protect their kids from dangers, but this show does not pose a danger to teens. Cancelling “Skins” is not the answer. Parents who object to the show can monitor what their child is watching and exercise their own discretion. It’s called parental controls. People should start looking at the show more deeply. Then they will realize that it’s more than skin deep.