Ugly News for Over 50 Years
|
|
|
|
Monday, February 27, 2006 By Daniel Dwyer- Staff Writer
P.E. STUDENTS in Kay Forrester’s class take a break. While ranking above the state average and second in the district, CV students are largely failing to meet all six state fitness standards. -
Advertising
Clayton Valley students are quite unfit.
Only 36.7 percent of ninth-graders last year met all six state health standards, according to the 2004-05 California Physical Fitness Report.
Some P.E.teachers are unsatisfied with the results of the tests last year’s freshmen took and believe that they must improve.
“It’s disappointing as a physical educator knowing that only 30 percent of students are passing the standards...” said P.E. teacher Jennifer Arnold.
Arnold believes the results may be lagging because of the block schedule.
“They [students] are only getting cardio-vascular exercise 2 to 3 times a week,” she said.
P.E. teacher Kay Forrester believes student apathy is to blame.
“Students should take the test more seriously,” she said. “The non-suits [students who don’t wear uniforms] are bringing averages down because they’re not in condition when the test comes.”
Some students feel P.E. doesn’t do enough for student health.
“P.E. does not help at all,” said freshman Michael Adan said. “You need to eat right too.”
The standards, however, are not taking into consideration how unhealthy our children are today, according to Arnold. The timing of the test, which must be given in February, March, April or May, doesn’t receive a great deal of conderation as well.
“We give the test late in the year,” she said. “By that time, they should be able to pass the test.”
The PFT is designed to discover information that will allow teachers to design curriculum for future physical education programs to improve scores.
The fitness areas tested by the PFT are aerobic capacity, body composition, abdominal strength and endurance, trunk extension strength, upper body strength and flexibility. All students enrolled in a California public school are required to take the PFT in grades five, seven and nine.
Aerobic capacity, body composition and upper body strength results worsened, whereas abdominal strength, trunk extension strength and flexibility standards have all improved since 2003-04.
The percentage of students successfully passing all six standards decreased by 37.5 percent in 2003-04, according to the 2004-05 PFT Report.
| |
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently 29 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Mon, Aug 15, 2011
Back to School Edition
- Fri, Dec 15, 2006
Volume 47 Issue 2
- Fri, Nov 17, 2006
Volume 47 Issue 1
- Wed, May 31, 2006
Volume 46 Issue 8
- Thu, Apr 27, 2006
Volume 46 Issue 8
- Fri, Mar 31, 2006
Volume 46 Issue 7
- Mon, Feb 27, 2006
Volume 46 Issue 6
- Mon, Jan 30, 2006
Volume 46 Issue 5
- Fri, Dec 16, 2005
Volume 46 Issue 4
- Mon, Nov 28, 2005
Volume 46 Issue 3
- Mon, Oct 31, 2005
Volume 46 Issue 2
- Fri, Sep 30, 2005
Volume 46 Issue 1
- Wed, Jun 15, 2005
Volume 45 Issue 9
- Fri, May 27, 2005
Volume 45 Issue 8
- Fri, Apr 29, 2005
Volume 45 Issue 7
- Fri, Mar 25, 2005
Volume 45 Issue 6
- Mon, Feb 28, 2005
Volume 45 Issue 5
- Thu, Jan 27, 2005
Volume 45 Issue 4
- Fri, Dec 17, 2004
Volume 45 Issue 3
- Fri, Nov 19, 2004
Volume 45 Issue 2
- Wed, Oct 20, 2004
Volume 45 Issue 1
- Fri, Apr 23, 2004
Volume 44 Issue 7
- Wed, Mar 17, 2004
Volume 44 Issue 6
- Fri, Feb 13, 2004
Volume 44 Issue 5
- Mon, Dec 01, 2003
Volume 44 Issue 4
- Thu, Nov 20, 2003
Volume 44 Issue 3
- Fri, Oct 24, 2003
Volume 44 Issue 2
- Fri, Sep 26, 2003
Volume 44 Issue 1
- Tue, Jul 01, 2003
LAUNCH
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|