The King's Page
Rufus King International School, High School Campus
Milwaukee, WI
Issue Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Issue: Volume 3, Issue 8
Last Update: Friday, May 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, September 28, 2010 By Staff
- Charde'a Bell-Taylor
Advertising
There’s an elephant in the room, and it’s about time to speak about it. The dress code has been a controversial topic, and it needs to be reviewed. It hasn’t been reviewed in about ten years, according to curriculum generalist Paul Gessner, and the dress code doesn’t fit with modern fashion.
We often hear students complain about the dress code, typically girls. Female violators are usually sent to administration for disobeying the fingertip rule, meaning their fingertips go past the length of their skirts or shorts. The fingertip rule is an inaccurate form of enforcement because different girls have different body types: Some girls have longer arms or shorter arms, some may have meatier arms and some may have skinnier arms. Using this system to say that someone’s clothing is inappropriate or not is very biased and unfair.
What’s inappropriate about a tank top with straps that aren’t two inches wide? What is so unbecoming about shorts that are a few inches away from our fingertips? We constantly hear teachers say that it’s a distraction when girls dress inappropriately. They fail to understand that it is also a boy’s responsibility to control his hormones.
The MPS dress code states, “Rules concerning dress may be established by individual schools only when they relate to a specific educational, health or safety purpose.”
“I don’t think that our dress code complies with the MPS dress code,” English teacher Amy Daroszeski said. “What does a spaghetti strapped tank top have to do with education, health or safety?”
A tank top or camisole does not disturb the learning process, it does not put anybody’s health at risk and it definitely does not put anyone in danger. So there is absolutely no point in telling students that they cannot wear it.
The purpose of the dress code, according to underfill administrator Diane Johnson-Horton, is to assure that students leave here knowing what’s appropriate and what’s not appropriate. If that is the case, then why isn’t staff required to follow the dress code?
“By contract, staff members are not obligated to follow the dress code,” Gessner said.
So isn’t that a double-standard, to say that students have to follow the dress code though those who enforce it don’t have to? It seems pretty hypocritical.
| |
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently 20 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Tue, Apr 12, 2011
Volume 3, Issue 7
- Tue, Mar 15, 2011
Volume 3, Issue 6
- Tue, Feb 15, 2011
Volume 3, Issue 5
- Tue, Jan 11, 2011
Volume 3, Issue 4
- Tue, Dec 07, 2010
Volume 3, Issue 3
- Tue, Nov 02, 2010
Volume 3, Issue 2
- Wed, Sep 29, 2010
Volume 3, Issue 1
- Tue, May 25, 2010
Volume 2, Issue 8
- Tue, Apr 20, 2010
Volume 2, Issue 7
- Tue, Mar 09, 2010
Volume 2, Issue 6
- Tue, Feb 02, 2010
Volume 2, Issue 5
- Tue, Dec 15, 2009
Volume 2, Issue 4
- Tue, Nov 03, 2009
Volume 2, Issue 3
- Tue, Sep 29, 2009
Volume 2, Issue 2
- Mon, Aug 17, 2009
Volume 2, Issue 1
- Tue, May 19, 2009
Volume 1, Issue 5
- Tue, Apr 07, 2009
Volume 1, Issue 4
- Tue, Feb 24, 2009
Volume 1, Issue 3
- Tue, Dec 16, 2008
Volume 1, Issue 2
- Wed, Nov 05, 2008
Volume 1 Issue 1
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|