|
|
|
|
Friday, February 26, 2010 By Bradley W. Parks
Advertising
65 teams and only one winner. March is one month that makes college basketball fans and addicted gamblers salivate. 2010’s March Madness basketball tournament is almost upon us and fans are getting hyped up, Vegas is preparing, and CBS is making room in their bank accounts. It isn’t as if this never happens. Every year March Madness rakes in millions, if not billions, for ad companies, CBS, and the NCAA. Imagine for a second, though, if that 65-team extravaganza was expanded to 96 teams. Would it be Basketball Heaven? Or would it be just an experiment gone horribly, horribly wrong?
Many March Maniacs are satisfied with 65 teams in the postseason, but some just have an insatiable desire for more tournament action. But when the tournament that is already the largest of all major sports, collegiate and professional, may be expanding, trouble could follow.
With the current system, all conference tournament champions (with the exception of the Ivy League that doesn’t hold a conference tournament; the regular season champion is given the bid) are granted an automatic bid into the field of 65. That means 30 teams are automatically getting an entrance into the tournament with 35 at-large bids left. Those 35 spots are reserved for teams that had solid seasons, but didn’t win their conference tournament. What remains of the tournament gives spots to “bubble teams,” or teams that haven’t had the best of seasons, but still showed promise as a tournament team with big wins. Some bubble teams make it and the rest typically go to the National Invitational Tournament (NIT).
An additional 31 teams would totally throw off the selection process. Bubble teams would become shoo-ins and the teams around .500 (or—gasp!—under .500) would become the bubble teams. I think that 65-team bracket captures all of the great teams and most of the good teams. But a 96-team bracket would suck up all of the great teams, the good teams, and some of the average/below average teams. Most of the great teams would get byes in the first round, so we would be watching the below average teams duke it out just to get down to a 64-team field again, so the first round would be pointless. The truth is that the playoffs are meant for good teams and great teams, and those teams make it there for a reason. Along those same lines, bad teams are not in the tournament for a reason.
Trust me, I love March Madness as much, if not more, than my fellow college basketball fans. As a fan, I would appreciate the sacred bracket that is March Madness only be graced with the presence of the elite teams.
| |
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently 43 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Wed, Apr 03, 2013
April 2013
- Fri, Mar 01, 2013
March 2013
- Thu, Jan 31, 2013
February 2013
- Tue, Jan 01, 2013
January 2013
- Thu, Nov 01, 2012
November/December 2012
- Wed, Oct 03, 2012
October 2012
- Wed, Sep 12, 2012
September 12, 2012
- Sun, May 20, 2012
May 24, 2012
- Wed, May 02, 2012
May 3, 2012
- Wed, Apr 11, 2012
April 11, 2012
- Wed, Feb 29, 2012
March 9, 2012
- Tue, Feb 14, 2012
February 17, 2012
- Thu, Feb 02, 2012
February 3, 2012
- Fri, Jan 13, 2012
January 13, 2012
- Fri, Dec 16, 2011
December 16, 2011
- Fri, Nov 11, 2011
November 18, 2011
- Fri, Oct 28, 2011
October 28, 2011
- Fri, Sep 30, 2011
September 30, 2011
- Fri, Sep 16, 2011
September 16, 2011
- Mon, May 23, 2011
May 23, 2011/ Final Edition
- Fri, May 06, 2011
May 6, 2011
- Wed, Apr 20, 2011
April 20, 2011
- Mon, Mar 28, 2011
March 28, 2011
- Fri, Mar 11, 2011
March 11, 2011
- Fri, Feb 11, 2011
February 11, 2011
- Fri, Jan 14, 2011
January 14, 2011
- Wed, Dec 22, 2010
December 22, 2010
- Fri, Dec 10, 2010
December 10, 2010
- Mon, Nov 22, 2010
November 22, 2010
- Fri, Nov 05, 2010
November 5, 2010
- Thu, Oct 21, 2010
October 22, 2010
- Fri, Oct 08, 2010
October 8, 2010
- Fri, Sep 24, 2010
September 24, 2010
- Sat, May 01, 2010
May 2010
- Thu, Apr 01, 2010
April 2010
- Mon, Mar 01, 2010
March 2010
- Mon, Feb 01, 2010
February 2010
- Fri, Jan 01, 2010
January 2010
- Tue, Dec 01, 2009
December issue
- Sun, Nov 01, 2009
November issue
- Thu, Oct 01, 2009
October issue
- Mon, Sep 14, 2009
September 2009
- Tue, Aug 25, 2009
Practice
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|