 |
 |
The Californian
California High School
San Ramon, CA
Issue Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009
Issue: Volume XVIII, Issue VII
Last Update: Tuesday, June 09, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently 23 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles. Volume XVIII, Issue VI - Friday, April 17, 2009Volume XVIII, Issue V - Wednesday, March 11, 2009Volume XVIII, Edition IV - Friday, February 06, 2009Volume XVIII, Issue III - Wednesday, December 17, 2008Volume XVIII Issue II - Tuesday, November 04, 2008Volume XVIII Issue I - Thursday, October 02, 2008Volume XVII Issue VIII - Thursday, June 05, 2008Volume XVII Issue VII - Thursday, May 08, 2008Volume XVII Issue VI - Thursday, April 10, 2008Volume XVII Issue V - Tuesday, March 04, 2008Volume XVII Edition IV - Monday, February 04, 2008Volume XVII Issue III - Tuesday, December 18, 2007Volume XVII Issue II - Thursday, November 08, 2007Volume XVII, Issue I - Thursday, October 04, 2007Volume XVI, Issue VIII - Friday, June 08, 2007Volume XVI, Issue VII - Tuesday, May 08, 2007Volume XVI, Issue VI - Thursday, April 05, 2007Volume XVI, Issue V - Thursday, March 08, 2007Volume XVI, Issue IV - Tuesday, February 06, 2007Volume XVI, Issue II - Thursday, November 16, 2006Volume XVI, Issue I - Wednesday, October 11, 2006Private - Monday, May 15, 2006Fail. - Monday, January 01, 2001
Zhuchen Xu Editor in Chief Jordan Hung Managing Editor Jean Zhu Photo Editor Rachel Cox Business Manager Bridget Bugbee News Editor Peggah Elahi News Editor Maiah Hollander News Editor Shilpa Balaji Features Editor Justin Jozwiak Features Editor Danielle Fernandez Sports Editor Trey Nelson Sports Editor Jason Alpert Sports Editor Shankar Logarajah Entertainment Editor Kyle Teese Entertainment Editor Abhinay Gajjala Opinions Editor John Isom Opinions Editor Max Feldman News Lite Editor Bailey Meyers Copy Editor Samara Al-Jumaily Staff Writer Aaron Bandler Staff Writer Staci Barranti Staff Writer Kelsey Belomy Staff Writer Austin Brooks Staff Writer Chelsie Chan Staff Writer Carly Chiesa Staff Writer Katrina Curry Staff Writer Ramsey DeLano Staff Writer Rachel Dittman Staff Writer Brandon Eiges Staff Writer Maithili Jalihal Staff Writer Ashley Jensen Staff Writer Han-Joo Kim Staff Writer Steven Lau Staff Writer Priscilla Lee Staff Writer Griffin Lewis Staff Writer Colleen Lillig Staff Writer Anthony Mignano Staff Writer Megan Molina Staff Writer Brett Morris Staff Writer Anshil Popli Staff Writer Sadie Remington Staff Writer Sana Sareshwala Staff Writer Meena Tafazzoli Staff Writer Anca Ulea Staff Writer Chloe Uyehara Staff Writer Clayton Wenner Staff Writer Nicola Yap Staff Writer Dennis Yim Staff Writer Cady DeLano Photographer Jake Sigl Photographer Sachin Patel Photographer Matt Pinto Photographer Dylan Booth Graphics Carlo Miraflor Graphics Brian Barr Advisor bbarr@calhigh.net
|
|
Advertising
|
|
| Member Login |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ArticleMedia]
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
By Californian Staff
Nowadays, anything labeled as “environmentally friendly” is flying off the shelves. As “going green” becomes an ever more popular trend, consumers fail to realize that many products they buy have little environmental benefit. This so-called “greenwashing” was at the center of a study recently conducted by TerraChoice, an environmental marketing consulting firm. By evaluating over 2,000 different cosmetics, household and kids products, TerraChoice found that only 2 percent of those advertised as “green” made legitimate claims. As in most advertising campaigns, corporations present their goods in such a way that will appeal to the public. In greenwashing, companies frequently mislead buyers about the environmental advantages of the product or company by using vague phrases such as “all natural” or providing environmental claims that have not been verified by a third party, among other tactics. Unfortunately, these techniques have proved to be overwhelmingly effective. Consumers often don’t give a second thought to the claims made by companies. What is worse, most people who purchase the so-called green products, ranging from T-shirts to toothpastes, aren’t willing to make the necessary lifestyle changes to accompany their green efforts. A tote bag, for example, that was made with “organic cotton” in an “environmentally neutral” factory has no environmental benefit whatsoever when it’s owner drives a gas-guzzling Hummer and keeps the lights in their home on 24/7. Even choosing to purchase a hybrid SUV will not solve the problem of climate change, no matter what car companies may advertise. That is not to say that easy changes in one’s daily routine cannot make a great positive impact on the environment. By simply turning off computers and other electronics that are not in use, people can prevent thousands of pounds of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere each year. Recycling both paper and electronics, as well as using less hot water, are two other important changes that have a much greater and far-reaching effect than any falsely labeled bottle of “environmentally friendly” dish washing liquid ever could. Going green does not begin with people changing fashion styles or by blindly following a trend, but by changing the way they live.
|
|
Back
To Previous Section
Back To Live Edition
 |
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT |
|
|
|
|