Search
The Advocate Martin Luther King - Law Advocacy & Community Justice New York, NY
Issue Date: Thursday, May 19, 2011 Issue: May 2011 Last Update: Thursday, January 19, 2012

At-a-glance

Advertising
    Teacherease.com– where students can see their real grades. But there seems to be some inconsistency. Teacherease said Student A had a grade of 12, but when report card day came, they had a grade of 55. Why? It’s simple math.

    Teachers experience problems at the end of the marking period with the new grading policy. Teachers cannot give students the grade truly deserved if the grade is below a 55 and any grade below a 90 must be given in increments of 5. The passing grade is 65.

    If a student’s grade is a 9, for example, then the teacher must give the student a 55.

A grade of 45 is an indication that the child has no seat time and is therefore ineligible for P.M. school or summer school, according to Principal Miriam Nightengale. Administration, however, must approve a grade of 45. Mia Bradford , one of the school’s guidance counselors, said that the administration, regardless, checks all grades to make sure that teachers aren’t giving grades unfairly.


“To me, about five teachers have complained,” said Bradford who is in charge of the school’s programming system.


This grading policy was installed by the NYC Department of Education the first marking period of the second semester in 2011. 


    Students are graded on two different measures. One measure is called “seat time” which measures the amount of time the student is physically present in class.

    Teachers like Ms. Pak, a Global History teacher, feel this policy is unfair because students who do some of their work end up receiving the same grade as other students who barely come to school.

    “It’s a double edged sword because to some it encourages and to others it makes them confident they can pass even with not enough work,” said Ms. Pak.
    Ms. Pak points out that it seems unfair that grades below a 55 must get bumped up to a 55.

“So if  a student gets a grade of 20, their grade must be bumped up to a 55--that’s a 35 point jump. Should other students get that same 35 point jump, too?” said Pak.


Ms. Nightengale, however, feels that the new grading policy is fair and provides balance for students. Nightengale feels that students are originally given “65 ways to fail and 45 ways to pass,” since 65 is the passing grade. The new grading policy, according to Nightengale, provides students with a balance so that there is “less space to fall.” In other words, a minimum grade of 55 prevents students’ averages from being weighed down by one class or semester.


“An average is supposed to give an overall picture of a students performance. An average can’t give a false picture of a student.”


Bradford feels that the grading policy is unfair because it gives students false hopes.

“It’s false  hope because students think they really got a 55 and that they are near passing, but they’re really not,” said Ms. Bradford.


If students received the grades they truly deserved, then grade-point-averages would drop severely.


“GPAs would be horrible and people would have 20% GPAs. Maybe it would give students a reality check,” said Ms. Bradford, who doesn’t sympathize with students who don’t do their work.


Ms. Bradford “has no sympathy.” She  personally feels that teachers should be able to give students their raw scores.


The grading policy is unfair to students who legitimately get a 55 because those students get the same grade as students who almost never do their work or almost never come to school. The person who legitimately gets a 55 could get the same grade if they only come to school for a few days.


    “If you get a zero, oh well,” said Ms. Bradford.

    In her opinion, people don’t get the same chances when they are adults. People are not given the same chance to “pass” when they get older.

    “If I don’t come to work, I’ll get fired,” said Ms. Bradford.

    Ms. Conwell, one of the assistant principals of the school, feels that the grading policy is made to allow consistency.

    If a students get a grade of 12, for example,  and this grade is factored into their average, they may not be able to pass the semester.

    Nightengale feels that math calculations should not be taken as a reflection of a student’s capacity.

    “The grading policy allows kids to rebound and overcome issues they had to face before,” said Conwell, “Either way, a 55 is a 55–a failing grade is a failing grade.”

Even certain students don’t feel that the new grading policy is fair. The students whose grades have been moved up to a 55 probably have no problem with this policy. But other students feel that students who do some work should not get the same grade as those who do almost no work.


    “I don’t think it’s fair because if you didn’t do work all year then you shouldn’t get that grade,” said Julia Parris, a sophomore of LACJ, “It’s unfair to those who work as opposed to those who don’t work.”

Back to the articles list

0 COMMENTS - Add your comment below

ADD YOUR COMMENT
Name
Email
Comments, recommendations or suggestions.
Submit

View PDF's

Current Conditions Rain Showers
Temperature: 48.6 °F
Wind Speed: 14 mph N
Gusts: 19 mph NNW
Rain Today: 0.33 "
Advertising